OnePaper ·  Putting the community back into community news Login   
 
 Welcome
 The VI Bar Herald
 Bar Info
 President`s Message
 Officers, Board & Staff
 Bar Basics
 Events Calendar
 Bar News
 Law Review & Articles
 Committees
 Invitation to Join
 Committee Rosters
 The Committees
 Attorney Discipline
 Young Lawyers
 Member Benefits
 Insurance
 Other Benefits
 Law Students
 Services
 Scholarship
 VI Bar Admission
 The Courts
 Territorial Court
 District Court
 3rd Circuit Court
 Supreme Court
 References
 Career Center
 Legal Research
 General Information
 Data & Other Info
 VI Organizations
 National Organizations
 Law Links
 VI Code
 LEXIS
 Public Resources
 Classifieds
 Legal Notices
 CLE
 Calendar
 Online CLE
 CLE Rules
 Contact VIBA
 President
 Executive Director
 Letters to the Editor
 
The VI Bar Herald
      The Source for VI Legal Info       OnePaper Community Edition       November 21st, 2009      
Email this Article Printer Friendly Version Login to Edit

"Fluctuating Workweek" Method Of Overtime Payment May Not Be Used Where Additional Payments, Such As Shift Differential, are Made
by Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, P.C.
Martindale.com, Legal Articles

     By way of background, according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers may use the fluctuating workweek method to compensate employees when their regular work schedule varies from week to week. This method permits employers to pay such employees a fixed amount each week as straight-time pay regardless of the number of hours worked, and to pay overtime at half time, rather than at time and one-half, for each hour worked over 40 in a week.
     In O'Brien v. Town of Agawam, the First Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Puerto Rico) ruled that the fluctuating workweek method may not be used when employers pay employees amounts in addition to their normal compensation. Specifically, the Court conditioned the use of the fluctuating workweek method on the following four factors:
     (1)the employee's hours must fluctuate from week to week;
     (2) the employee must receive a fixed salary that does not vary with the number of hours worked during the week (excluding overtime premiums);
     (3) the fixed amount must be sufficient to provide compensation every week at a regular rate that is at least equal to the minimum wage; and
     (4) the employer and employee must share a "clear mutual understanding" that the employer will pay that fixed salary regardless of the number of hours worked.
     In this case, employees were paid night shift differentials, additional pay for every hour worked beyond eight hours a day, and additional pay for every hour worked during off-duty time. The Court held that because supplementary compensation was paid, the employees' salaries were not truly "fixed" as required by the regulations. Therefore, the employer was not entitled to use the fluctuating workweek method.
     
     

"Fluctuating Workweek" Method Of Overtime Payment May Not Be Used Where Additional Payments, Such As Shift Differential, are Made
   Employers may need to reassess their use of the "fluctuating workweek" method to compensate employees on irregular schedules in light of a court's recent decision that such method may not be utilized when additional compensation (such as shift differentials) is provided in addition to an employee's regular salary.
Click here for More...
Supreme Court to Hear Cases on Displaying Ten Commandments
   WASHINGTON, Oct. 12 — The Supreme Court put itself today in the center of an emotional and politically charged issue as it agreed to hear cases from Texas and Kentucky on the constitutionality of displaying the Ten Commandments on government land and buildings.
  The justices will try to resolve a conflict between two federal appeals courts that cover seven states, from the Canadian border to the Deep South, with widely differing social and political histories.
  
Click here for More...
It's Tax Time in the VI: A Review of the Law for Individuals
   In anticipation of April 15th, St. Thomas tax attorney Richard P. Bourne-Vanneck (rbv@vilaw.com) gives a review of United States Virgin Islands tax law as applicable to individuals.
Click here for More...
Legal System in the United States Virgin Islands
   St. Croix Attorney Bernard C. Pattie (boinie@compuserve.com) of the Christiansted firm of Pattie & Daley gives an overview of the legal system in the United States Virgin Islands
Click here for More...



WEB SEARCH